
|
|
The
problems begin before students apply to do a degree, but they come
to a head during the legal practice course (LPC). Too much time
is spent on remedial education, making up what the students didn’t
learn at university, or have already forgotten. The introduction
of fees into degree-level education has had a distorting effect
on the courses they want to take in the LPC. |
The consequence
of the need to prepare so many students for commercial law practice
means that the courses are both too narrow and too wide: they
don’t
prepare in depth for either a career in commercial law or in public sector
law, but offer a bit of both.
On top of all that there are staff shortages across the academic world, and
an uncertainty about the future.
To
begin at the beginning, the introduction of fees for university
tuition, on top of the replacement of study grants by student loans,
has caused widespread fear.
It’s wrong that an article on the views of the Deans and Directors of LPC
courses should spend so much time talking about the effect of fees. Most of the
readers of this have made the decision that they will pay fees, after all. Unfortunately,
it’s only wrong morally. To ignore the effect of fees on the LPC is like
ignoring the elephant in the sitting-room. |
|
"To
begin at the beginning, the introduction of fees for university
tuition, on top of the replacement of study grants by student loans,
has caused widespread fear." |
| "The
proportion of students from a working-class background has fallen.
This is a paradox, because it was the Government’s aim to
broaden the range of people going to university." |
|
The
proportion of students from a working-class background has fallen.
This is a paradox, because it was the Government’s aim to
broaden the range of people going to university.
But in the longer term it is having beneficial effects, in forcing the heads
of legal training institutions to find creative solutions. Nottingham Law School
is finalising a deal with a local college of further education to provide a two-year
course that will admit people to the second year of its law degree. BPP, a commercial
provider of professional courses, is running distance-learning courses with lectures
one weekend a month. |
| So
access can be widened. The problem is that law degrees are starved
of funding. Vice-chancellors love law faculties because they don’t
need a lot of capital. But the undergraduates are cheated by the
universities, who divert their fees to other faculties, and then
by the law departments themselves, which take money paid for teaching
to fund research. The result is that there are not enough lecturers
to keep students on their toes. |
|
"So
access can be widened. The problem is that law degrees are starved
of funding." |
|
|
There
are two things you need throughout almost any law studies, a knowledge
of how to use your tools (statutes and cases), and an understanding
of contract law. These have to be taught at once. The problem is
that, as Peter Jones, Dean of Nottingham Law School, says “Unless
something is assessed students won’t take it seriously.”
Nottingham
Law School |
The
effect of this is that, although research is taught in depth, the next
courses students take are taught by hand-outs, and the skills atrophy.
To give students the grounding they need there needs to be compulsory
mooting
and a major project involving understanding of statute law, throughout
the
degree. “Those are staff intensive”, Professor Jones admits, “they’ve
had to go.”
Complaints
by LPC staff about the inadequacies of law graduates have reached
such a pitch that the universities are taking action, and the product
(you are, rather brutally, called ‘product‘at each
stage) is expected to improve in the next two or three years.
Conversely, the purity of academia has been shattered, and there is competition
for students and the best students. The College of Law is currently looking at
the feasibility of extended mooting and running a hypothetical deal. |
|
"Complaints
by LPC staff about the inadequacies of law graduates have reached
such a pitch that the universities are taking action...." |
"The
other area in which the LPC has to be remedial is in ‘commerciality’.
|
|
The
other area in which the LPC has to be remedial is in ‘commerciality’.
This is compelled by the commercial law firms, who say trainees
are embarking on a life of commercial law with no idea what the
City of London does.
That is partly the fault of the English system, which allows 17-year-olds to
make career decisions that most other countries put off to the post-graduate
phase. However, this is being diluted by the number of graduates of other disciplines
who are coming onto the LPC after taking the CPE. Law firms love engineers, scientists
and language graduates. |
 |
|
Nigel
Savage, Chief Executive of the College of Law, says “Students
are voting with their feet.” He dismissed the observation
that solicitors with the one-year CPE qualification were not
recognised as legally qualified in New York or Sydney.
“ That assumes that law is local. It’s global. You don’t need
to register in New York to do a gas pipeline in Azerbaijan for a US law firm.”
The College of Law |
But
that brings up a longer-term problem: is your LPC necessary? Professor
Bob Lee of Cardiff University (and an assessor for the
Law Society) makes the point that education is global. “I’m looking
at paying £30,000 for my son to study engineering at Nottingham.
But if I’ve got to pay the fees wouldn’t it be better
to send him to MIT or CalTech? And doesn’t the same apply
to law? Isn’t a New York Bar qualification just as attractive
to employers?"
University
of Cardiff Law School
Centre for Professional Legal Studies
|
|
|
People have complained in the past about the distorting effect of
the City’s
voracious demand for trainees. Now they are complaining of the demand
of students for the course that will most advantage them with commercial
law
firms. “In a way we’ve become supply-led”, muses
Professor Lee. “Students put huge pressure on firms for a summer
placement, and on chambers for a mini-pupillage. Some of them must
be being
found places
out of altruism.”

Oxford
Institute of Legal Practice |
|
The
problem is that the LPC is in a strait-jacket, forced on it by
the Law Society. It has to teach certain compulsory courses, and
teach others to a certain depth. “The required standards
and required competencies produces a skeletal lawyer, with no flesh
of understanding on the bones.” says Nick Johnson,
of the Oxford Institute of Legal Practice. “If I had the freedom
I’d reduce the syllabus to make way for the realities of
legal life. I’d like to give them a flavour of reality: authority,
ethics, even dealing with your secretary.”
|
That was
a middle-of -road-view. One side complained that the Law Society was
being strangled by its own structure, and could not
make the changes
needed. The other side was represented by Professor Jones, who
said “I
would be uncomfortable if we lost the broadly-trained, lateral-thinking
solicitor. But the programme must be more closely tied to practice.”
Of
course, there is already a specialised course, for students aiming
for commercial legal practice. Early feedback from the first year
is -anecdotally- good, says John Hermann, a director of
BPP Law School. “The initial feedback is that trainees this year
do show more commercial awareness.” he says. “Their
research skills are better, and they know more substantive law.”
BPP Law School |
|
|
Feedback
from trainees who have been through the course is that it was quite
demanding (“We make no pretence otherwise” says
Hermann) but there is a direct correlation between what they
learn on the course
and practice.
This is a difficult area to talk about, because the teaching
methods at each institution vary, and they change from year to
year. The
fashion in
educational
circles for continuous assessment is on the wane. Practice showed
that students were concentrating on the narrow detail of the
assessment, rather than the
broader view needed to sit the exam. There’s also an awareness
that written skills are at least as important as debating ones.
"Finally,
there is a growing worry about staff to teach the courses."
|
|
Finally,
there is a growing worry about staff to teach the courses. In the
past recruiting teachers has not been difficult. Many lawyers decide
after three or four years as solicitors that they have had enough
of late-night and weekend working.
The City in general, not just law firms, has not been an equal opportunity employer
for women or ethnic minorities. And there are many people who have an affinity
for teaching.
|
Lately,
though, things have been growing more difficult. “We’re
still making good appointments, but the short-lists aren’t so
good.” admits
Nick Johnson. Bob Lee says two rounds of advertising for five posts
have netted one appointment.
Haven’t these people heard there’s a recession? Every week the
trade press is full of stories of teams of lawyers being axed. That’s
true, but have they the right experience? BPP Law School is paying well,
and offering an attractive variety of work, says Hermann, but it’s
still difficult to find people to teach equity finance.
There are two reasons for this famine. The first is something the public
cannot believe: City lawyers are poorly paid. It’s relative, admittedly,
but they are attractive potential employees in the City and Wall Street,
where institutions can pay them a lot more, sometimes several times more.
Even in this recession City lawyers worry about retention rates.
The second reason is the re-structuring of law firms. Support lawyers
get a handsome salary and a family life. High-quality women, in particular,
are
not leaving the City law firms in the same numbers as in the past.
What
is saving the situation at the moment is the middle-aged. Many
recent appointments have been of lawyers in their forties who
are cashing in their chips, restructuring
their lives and looking for something useful and more enjoyable.
All this sounds very gloomy. It is partly because of the psychological impact
of making 18-year-olds pay to go to university. This must be a passing phase.
It’s established in the United States, and Australia adopted it a few years
ago.
|
|
"What
is saving the situation at the moment is the middle-aged."
|
In the long
term the introduction of fees may be beneficial. It is forcing a shake-up
of education, with new courses to widen access,
and an insistence
by better-informed ‘consumers’ (both students and law
firms) on better-quality teaching.
Speaking to the deans and directors did not give me an impression
of doom and battle-weariness. Over all, my feeling was that these
were
practical
men who are realistic about the difficulties, but are laying the foundations.
Links to information on the Legal Practice Course
Compiled by The Editors, Consilio
Nick
Gillies reviews the state of the LPC with leading law firms

|